Off-campus Pacific University users: To download campus access theses and dissertations, please log into our proxy server with your PUNet ID and password.

Non-Pacific University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis or dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Theses or dissertations that have a specific embargo period indicated below will not be available to anyone until the date indicated.

Date of Award

7-26-2004

Degree Type

Thesis (On-Campus Access Only)

Degree Name

Master of Science in Clinical Psychology (MSCP)

Committee Chair

Catherine Miller

Abstract

Termination of parental rights (TPR) effectively dissolves a parent's legal right to his or her child. Termination cases are referred to the court based on standards identified within both federal legislation (ASFA) and state statutes. Psychologists are often asked to complete evaluations to aid the court in decision making (Condie, 2003). In research, psychologists have identified factors that are consistent in TPR cases and have published guidelines for completing parental fitness evaluations (Kuehnle et aI., 2000), Judges' written decisions in appeals of termination of parental rights cases in Oregon were the source of data for this study. It was hypothesized that factors identified by psychologists as important for the determination of parental fitness would not fully coincide with factors used by the judges in these cases. The results indicate that judges form decisions based on only a handful of factors. Further directions in research and clinical approaches are discussed.

Share

COinS