Off-campus Pacific University users: To download campus access theses and dissertations, please log into our proxy server with your PUNet ID and password.

Non-Pacific University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis or dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Theses or dissertations that have a specific embargo period indicated below will not be available to anyone until the date indicated.

Date of Award

12-13-2002

Degree Type

Thesis (On-Campus Access Only)

Degree Name

Master of Science in Clinical Psychology (MSCP)

Committee Chair

Catherine Miller, PhD

Abstract

Current procedures of involuntary psychiatric commitment in Oregon are discussed. Potential system flaws during initial psychiatric assessment, including police and mental health professional's interpretation of commitment procedures and their ability to assess mental illness, family involvement, psychiatric/behavioral symptoms distracting from full medical evaluations and substance intoxication are reviewed. Defensive psychiatry as a factor of increased commitment to avoid the evaluating physician's civil liability is considered. Sociocultural issues are also discussed, as are re-examination and court proceedings of the committed individual. The interactions of ethical models to consider the ethical conflict of involuntary psychiatric commitment are analyzed. Social issues around dangerousness and implied social control are examined. Finally, systemic alternatives to current commitment procedures in Oregon are reviewed.

Share

COinS