Off-campus Pacific University users: To download campus access theses and dissertations, please log into our proxy server with your PUNet ID and password.

Non-Pacific University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis or dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Theses or dissertations that have a specific embargo period indicated below will not be available to anyone until the date indicated.

Date of Award

12-13-2002

Degree Type

Thesis (On-Campus Access Only)

Degree Name

Master of Science in Clinical Psychology (MSCP)

Committee Chair

J. R. Antick

Abstract

Academic detailing has been a common and successful method used to influence change in medical practice. The credibility of the detailer ( or representative) is one variable identified as contributing to the effectiveness of academic detailing and the likelihood of influencing change. While many factors of credibility have been established through past research (Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Berlo, Lemert, & Mertz, 1969; Whitehead, 1974; McCroskey & Young, 1981), these variables have not been applied to research in a medical setting. This study assessed two dimensions of credibility, perceived competence and perceived character, in order to establish which variables are more likely to influence physicians' professional practice through academic detailing. As hypothesized, the variables related to the credibility dimension of 'competence' were rated as more important to practitioners than those related to the dimension of 'character.' The variables of age and gender were rated low in importance to practitioners' perceptions of credibility, while educational level was rated as being moderately important. Males and females differed in their opinions of the importance of the credibility variables of training and expertness, with females rating them as being more important than males. Lastly, practitioners gave additional information as to what they believe makes a detailer effective.

Share

COinS