Off-campus Pacific University users: To download campus access theses and dissertations, please log into our proxy server with your PUNet ID and password.

Non-Pacific University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis or dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Theses or dissertations that have a specific embargo period indicated below will not be available to anyone until the date indicated.

Date of Award

7-23-1999

Degree Type

Thesis (On-Campus Access Only)

Degree Name

Master of Science in Psychology

Committee Chair

Maryka Biaggio, PhD

Abstract

Legal and societal standards for determining child custody have changed over the past century. Originally, children were deemed the property of the father; shortly thereafter, children were awarded as a consolation prize for the parent judged to be "not at fault" in the divorce (Stamps, Kunen, & Lawyer, 1996). Currently, children are regarded as valuable people whose best interests are an important element of custody determinations. The overwhelming number of custody cases have led the courts to refer the most complex cases to custody evaluators. These custody evaluators then make a recommendation to the judge, who has been shown to follow that recommendation in 60% of the cases (Kunin, Ebbesen, & Konecni, 1992). With the custody evaluator as an integral part of the custody process, the factors evaluators consider and the consistency of their judgments are important to explore. Factors used in determining child custody cases were examined. Trained and - untrained custody-evaluators were asked to make custody determinations on 80 case . vignettes. The decisions ,\,Vere evaluated using a Brunswikian policy-capturing approach. Results revealed that individual participants use different factors in determining custody. Trained and untrained participants' decision policies were not notably different from one another. Participants were unable to accurately identify the factors that influenced their decisions. Discussion involved notable cue topics, including financial stability, relationship quality, parenting skills, parental conflict, and GAL recommendation. Implications of these topics are discussed

Share

COinS