Off-campus Pacific University users: To download campus access theses and dissertations, please log into our proxy server with your PUNet ID and password.
Non-Pacific University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis or dissertation through interlibrary loan.
Theses or dissertations that have a specific embargo period indicated below will not be available to anyone until the date indicated.
Date of Award
Dissertation (On-Campus Access Only)
Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)
Miller Garrison, PhD
Sheila R. Bob, PhD
The purpose of this review was to investigate whether there were any criteria that would allow a therapist to differentially select between traditional marital therapy (TMT) and marital enrichment programs (MEP's) for couples in distress. A comprehensive effort was made to generate literature-supported criteria for choosing between these two modalities. Factors examined included indicators, contraindicators, predictor variables, and demonstrated effectiveness of each modality. Some support was found for the effectiveness of both modalities; however, little support was found for specific variables that would predict success in either one. Other variables identified as correlated with positive · treatment outcome were client modality preference, client expectancies for treatment, client's level of motivation to participate in treatment, and the development of a strong therapeutic alliance. One important finding ,was that MEP's can be effective with somewhat distressed couples; therefore, the historical distinction between distressed and nondistressed clients may need to be modified in favor of differentiating moderately distressed from severely distressed clients for purposes of inclusion/exclusion in either MEP's or TMT presented in a group format.
Crawford, Pamela Michele (1994). Couples in distress: Marital enrichment vs traditional marital therapy (Doctoral dissertation, Pacific University). Retrieved from: