Off-campus Pacific University users: To download campus access theses and dissertations, please log into our proxy server with your PUNet ID and password.
Non-Pacific University users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this thesis or dissertation through interlibrary loan.
Theses or dissertations that have a specific embargo period indicated below will not be available to anyone until the date indicated.
Date of Award
Dissertation (On-Campus Access Only)
Doctor of Psychology (PsyD)
The ongoing debate about psychology's status as a science involves questions about the nature of consciousness, and the proper methodology for studying it. A comparison of Freud and Jung's theories of dream interpretation is the
starting point for a discussion of contrasting methodologies. Philosophical traditions are explored that offer alternative views. An experimental-behaviorist paradigm is contrasted with a phenomenological-humanistic paradigm. The peculiar nature of consciousness, its reflexivity, highlights the need for a special methodology. Dialectical constructs are offered as contributing to a method that "best-fits" the subject matter. Comparisons are made between this alternative method and several sub-disciplines: developmental psychology, object relations, and classical psychoanalytic drive theory. These sub-disciplines are taken from the literature as ones that best exemplify the use of dialectical constructs. The dissertation ends with a comparison of the practical implications from each paradigm for the therapeutic role of empathy, a construct deemed essential to the therapeutic process by several authors.
Bagai, Robin D. (1990). Classical scientific methodology and the reflexivity of consciousness; a comparison (Doctoral dissertation, Pacific University). Retrieved from: